Soil function and biodiversity: regional variations and climate changes

Embora o objetivo principal da proteção internacional dos solos seja proteger tanto as funções quanto a estrutura do solo, a atual abordagem trata principalmente da proteção ao nível estrutural. Há uma carência de estudos que contemplem a ligação das funções do solo com os níveis da comunidade. Além disso, é ainda desconhecido se as variáveis ambientais (ex: tipos de solo, condições climáticas) atuam nas funções do solo da mesma maneira que influenciam sua estrutura biológica. Ademais, as alterações climáticas poderão ter sozinhas ou combinadas com os poluentes, um grande efeito nos ecossistemas terrestres. O presente trabalho propõe estudar as funções e a estrutura biológica do solo quando impactados devido a estresse tóxico (poluição por Cu) e/ou alterações a fatores como a temperatura e abundância de organismos, de maneira a simular possíveis variações regionais ou climáticas. Para alcançar os objetivos principais 3 experiências utilizando diferentes densidades de E. crypticus e 2 gerações foram feitas (Capítulos II e III). Duas experiências com mesocosmos (SMS) decorreram durante 3 meses sob uma gama de diversas temperaturas (10 – 29°C), que representam temperaturas médias para Portugal e Dinamarca (Capítulos IV e V). Duas experiências de campo também foram realizadas com intuito de validar os SMSs (Capítulo VI). Resultados demonstraram que os efeitos do Cu na reprodução dos enquitraídeos dependem da densidade inicial de organismos, especialmente na 2ª geração. Entretanto, nos SMSs expostos a Cu, a densidade inicial é menos importante nos resultados finais. O aumento da temperatura alterou majoritariamente a fase inicial de crescimento populacional. Em períodos mais longos, a abundância estabilizou tornando-se menos influenciada pelas temperaturas. Períodos longos de exposição reforçaram os efeitos da temperatura, como por ex: diversas espécies foram similarmente afetadas a 29 ou 26°C quando expostas durante 28 ou 61 dias respectivamente. De forma geral, o Cu reduziu a abundância da maioria das espécies ao longo do tempo, com poucas exceções. Os resultados da decomposição da matéria orgânica (MO) e atividade alimentar associaram-se com a abundância de organismos em baixas temperaturas (10-23°C). Entretanto, com o aumento das temperaturas (19-29°C), este comportamento não foi claro e a abundância de espécies e atividade alimentar diminuíram enquanto a decomposição da MO aumentou. Além disso, os resultados observados nos SMSs foram confirmados no campo. Mais especificamente, alterações ocorreram na fase de crescimento (correspondente à Primavera) e a exposição ao Cu diminuiu os efeitos da temperatura. Metodologias mais complexas (ex: mais gerações e experiências com múltiplas espécies) apresentam muitos benefícios, mas também proporcionam respostas mais complexas, as quais exigem um maior “peso” de evidências para serem comprovadas.

Challenges in mercury speciation and fractionation in soil and sediment

This investigation focused on the development, test and validation of methodologies for mercury fractionation and speciation in soil and sediment. After an exhaustive review of the literature, several methods were chosen and tested in well characterised soil and sediment samples. Sequential extraction procedures that divide mercury fractions according to their mobility and potential availability in the environment were investigated. The efficiency of different solvents for fractionation of mercury was evaluated, as well as the adequacy of different analytical instruments for quantification of mercury in the extracts. Kinetic experiments to establish the equilibrium time for mercury release from soil or sediment were also performed. It was found that in the studied areas, only a very small percentage of mercury is present as mobile species and that mobility is associated to higher aluminium and manganese contents, and that high contents of organic matter and sulfur result in mercury tightly bound to the matrix. Sandy soils tend to release mercury faster that clayey soils, and therefore, texture of soil or sediment has a strong influence on the mobility of mercury. It was also understood that analytical techniques for quantification of mercury need to be further developed, with lower quantification limits, particularly for mercury quantification of less concentrated fractions: water-soluble e exchangeable. Although the results provided a better understanding of the distribution of mercury in the sample, the complexity of the procedure limits its applicability and robustness. A proficiency-testing scheme targeting total mercury determination in soil, sediment, fish and human hair was organised in order to evaluate the consistency of results obtained by different laboratories, applying their routine methods to the same test samples. Additionally, single extractions by 1 mol L-1 ammonium acetate solution, 0.1 mol L-1 HCl and 0.1 mol L-1 CaCl2, as well as extraction of the organometallic fraction were proposed for soil; the last was also suggested for sediment and fish. This study was important to update the knowledge on analytical techniques that are being used for mercury quantification, the associated problems and sources of error, and to improve and standardize mercury extraction techniques, as well as to implement effective strategies for quality control in mercury determination. A different, “non chemical-like” method for mercury species identification was developed, optimised and validated, based on the thermo-desorption of the different mercury species. Compared to conventional extraction procedures, this method has advantages: it requires little to no sample treatment; a complete identification of species present is obtained in less than two hours; mercury losses are almost neglectable; can be considered “clean”, as no residues are produced; the worldwide comparison of results obtained is easier and reliable, an important step towards the validation of the method. Therefore, the main deliverables of this PhD thesis are an improved knowledge on analytical procedures for identification and quantification of mercury species in soils and sediments, as well as a better understanding of the factors controlling the behaviour of mercury in these matrices.

Understanding and modelling hydrological and soil erosion processes in burnt forest catchments

Forest fires implications in overland flow and soil erosion have been researched for several years. Therefore, is widely known that fires enhance hydrological and geomorphological activity worldwide as also in Mediterranean areas. Soil burn severity has been widely used to describe the impacts of fire on soils, and has being recognized as a decisive factor controlling post-fire erosion rates. However, there is no unique definition of the term and the relationship between soil burn severity and post-fire hydrological and erosion response has not yet been fully established. Few studies have assessed post-fire erosion over multiple years, and the authors are aware of none which assess runoff. Small amount of studies concerning pre-fire management practices were also found. In the case of soil erosion models, the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) and the revised Morgan–Morgan–Finney (MMF) are well-known models, but not much information is available as regards their suitability in predicting post-fire soil erosion in forest soils. The lack of information is even more pronounced as regards post-fire rehabilitation treatments. The aim of the thesis was to perform an extensive research under the post fire hydrologic and erosive response subject. By understanding the effect of burn severity in ecosystems and its implications regarding post fire hydrological and erosive responses worldwide. Test the effect of different pre-fire land management practices (unplowed, downslope plowed and contour plowed) and time-since-fire, in the post fire hydrological and erosive response, between the two most common land uses in Portugal (pine and eucalypt). Assess the performance of two widely-known erosion models (RUSLE and Revised MMF), to predict soil erosion rates during first year following two wildfires of distinctive burn severity. Furthermore, to apply these two models considering different post-fire rehabilitation treatments in an area severely affected by fire. Improve model estimations of post-fire runoff and erosion rates in two different land uses (pine and eucalypt) using the revised MMF. To assess these improvements by comparing estimations and measurements of runoff and erosion, in two recently burned sites, as also with their post fire rehabilitation treatments. Model modifications involved: (1) focusing on intra-annual changes in parameters to incorporate seasonal differences in runoff and erosion; and (2) inclusion of soil water repellency in runoff predictions. Additionally, validate these improvements with the application of the model to other pine and eucalypt sites in Central Portugal. The review and meta-analysis showed that fire occurrence had a significant effect on the hydrological and erosive response. However, this effect was only significantly higher with increasing soil burn severity for inter-rill erosion, and not for runoff. This study furthermore highlighted the incoherencies between existing burn severity classifications, and proposed an unambiguous classification. In the case of the erosion plots with natural rainfall, land use factor affected annual runoff while land management affected both annual runoff and erosion amounts significantly. Time-since-fire had an important effect in erosion amounts among unplowed sites, while for eucalypt sites time affected both annual runoff and erosion amounts. At all studied sites runoff coefficients increase over the four years of monitoring. In the other hand, sediment concentration in the runoff, recorded a decrease during the same period. Reasons for divergence from the classic post-fire recovery model were also explored. Short fire recurrence intervals and forest management practices are viewed as the main reasons for the observed severe and continuing soil degradation. The revised MMF model presented reasonable accuracy in the predictions while the RUSLE clearly overestimated the observed erosion rates. After improvements: the revised model was able to predict first-year post-fire plot-scale runoff and erosion rates for both forest types, these predictions were improved both by the seasonal changes in the model parameters; and by considering the effect of soil water repellency on the runoff, individual seasonal predictions were considered accurate, and the inclusion of the soil water repellency in the model also improved the model at this base. The revised MMF model proved capable of providing a simple set of criteria for management decisions about runoff and erosion mitigation measures in burned areas. The erosion predictions at the validation sites attested both to the robustness of the model and of the calibration parameters, suggesting a potential wider application.